EUROMEDICA 

Hanover

23-24  Mai 2011

Advanced methods of diagnosis,
treatment and prophylactics

European Academy of Natural Sciences, Hanover

European Scientific Society, Hanover


Tatyana Bendas GENDER AND CULTURAL FACTORS OF LEADER’ AND MANAGER’ HEALTHY AND WELL-BEING
Orenburg State University, Orenburg Russia

Framework: A healthy and well-being of managers is very important but not enough known problem. A literature analysis discoveries: a work situation of leaders and managers isn’t favorable. It may be connected with psychological unhealthy and well-being of them. The men and women are influenced by different factors: gender and cultural stereotypes, which reject a female leadership, and society pressure, which demands a successful male leadership. The signs of unfavorable women-leaders’ well-being are: a fear of success, an androgyne personality treats, a tendency to copy a male leadership behavior, a token role (not dominant), the subordinates’ disapproval. The unfavorable man-leader’ well-being is studied worse than a woman’ one.

Aim: An investigation gender and cultural differences of leader’ and manager’ psychological healthy and well-being.

Results: 300 Subjects (non-leaders, student leaders, university’s managers, 150 women and 150 men, 150 Russian and 150 Kazakh, age 17-70 years old) were investigated by some methods: MMPI, Cattell, Lusher, TAT, interview. Mathematic methods: Student’ t-criteria, factor analysis.

Gender differences: 1) a leader’, a man-leader’ and a woman-leader’ factor personality structure included an emotional non-well-being as central factor; 2) women had worse scores of psychological healthy and wellbeing than the men (hypochondria, hypomania, anxiety, fear of success, marriage failure, a leadership role made personal and work situation worse and wasn’t approved by boy-friends) or better ones (depression, hysteria, schizophrenia, rejection of psychological norm); 3) the leaders and managers of both sexes had more problems of psychological unhealthy and well-being (as compared with non-leaders).

Culture differences: 1) Kazakh women had worse scores of psychological healthy and well-being than Russian women (hypochondria, depression, paranoia, schizophrenia, fear of power) or better ones (they were born in a town or in a country, in a full family and had more siblings); 2) Kazakh men had worse scores of psychological healthy and well-being than Russian men (anxiety, psyhasthenia, depression, fear of power, sexual deviation, they were praised by supervisors seldom) or better ones (they were bring up in a full family and had more siblings); 3)

Kazakh women had worse scores of psychological healthy and well-being than Russian men (hypochondria, hypomania, anxiety, fear of success, fear of power, fear of affiliation, a strive to energy waste) or better ones (depression, they were born in a town or in a country and had more siblings); 4) Russian women had worse scores of psychological healthy and well-being than Kazakh men (hypochondria, hypomania, marriage failure, they were born in a city and were bring up without siblings, they had worse relationship with their mother in teens, a leadership role made personal situation worse and wasn’t approved by boy-friends) or better ones (psyhasthenia, depression, schizophrenia, sexual deviation, diffidence).

Conclusion: A gender and a culture may be important factors influenced to leader’ and manager’ psychological healthy and well-being.

Implication: Professional success criteria, personality, behavior may be male and female. So the leaders and managers need a special psychological support, taking into account a gender and a culture. And we have to inform medical managers about this results and apply it in practice.